FTC v. Meta: the antitrust battle over Instagram and WhatsApp
See all Stories
L
WhatsApp could have made enough money without ads.
Acton testifies that the startup had already broken even on the roughly $8 million it raised and had only begun charging its $1 per year subscription in seven countries, meaning there was plenty of room to grow. As its pricing power grew, he theorizes, WhatsApp could have eventually bumped the price to $5 or $10 per year. While the FTC has theorized that WhatsApp likely would have had to run ads eventually to satisfy investors — with or without Meta — Meta says the founders had no interest or need to shift to an ad model without the acquisition.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- OpenAI pauses training of its ‘most capable models’
- Apple hit with $5.7 billion in damages over haptic patents
- Control Resonant is a great game — it’s even better when you read everything
- Leaks reveal a new Apple HomePod mini, iPad mini, and Apple TV 4K
- Can Apple Home’s AI camera features outsmart Amazon’s and Google’s? I put them to the test











